As I was waiting for the water to boil for my coffee this morning -- yes, I make my coffee by manually pouring just-under-boiling water over freshly ground Sumatra beans; doesn't everybody?
mmmmmmm -- I turned on my computer to see what goodies the cyberspace fairy had left in my inbox overnight. Because one of my favorite "secular" magazines is
The Atlantic, which still seems to turn a profit by posting all of its print content, and then some, online to its elegant and user-friendly website, I subscribe to both the print edition and regular emails notifying of new online content. This morning there were two articles about Amazon's new 2
nd-generation reading device, the Kindle 2,
one con and the
other pro. (At this point, I don't have time to get into that fray, however, my opinions will be forthcoming in due time. They are still mellowing in the cellar. BTW, having resisted the first Kindle because I wanted them to get the bugs out, it should come as a surprise to no one who knows me that I was one of the first to order the Kindle 2, and it was delivered on Ash Wednesday. More about that later too.)
Fast forward slightly to the next time I checked email, about a half-hour ago; two relevant and related things jumped out at me. One was a new article by the
NCR's highly respected Vatican observer, John Allen, on an important side of Benedict XVI that, among many of his important sides, gets routinely neglected or distorted by the media of both the so-called "right" and the so-called "left." Now that I've whetted your appetite, you'll have to read the article to see what it is:
click here.
Hand-in-hand with that, I find it significant that, under Benedict's leadership, the Vatican is very proactively forging a presence on both
YouTube and
Facebook.
The second item was a new post on one of the sites I keep in touch with daily, the
Deacon's Bench blog ("where a Roman Catholic Deacon ponders the world"). He cites an article from the Arlington, Virginia,
Catholic Herald about "
Faith in the Age of Facebook."
We can sometimes lament the passing away of old media -- for better or worse, ink on paper is giving way to the many facets of cyberspace communication -- but the question has to be asked and answered, how can the "new media," even with its forms that develop and mutate almost daily, serve the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
The answer is not a simple one because the terms of the question itself are not simple.
Spend a little time with the articles I've cited. (Personally, I find reading on the computer screen more conducive to both speed and retention than on paper. I haven't figured out why, but it may be that scrolling actually accomplishes the speed-reading methods I learned in college but never disciplined myself to practice. Also, I find that white or yellow letters on a black background are much easier on the eyes. )
The title I gave this post is, of course, a bit of wordplay. Traditional philosophy and theology have always sought the "middle course" (via media) as the safe and sure navigation between extremes. Today, as in the past, the vessel by which that course could be navigated was the latest in media technology. Don't forget that invention of paper (papyrus) that could be bound in folios rather than rolled up in scrolls, the art of stained glass, and the movable type printing press were all at one time innovative technologies that revolutionized communication and put an end to a previous era.
What do you think?